
While the movie Unforgiven has absolutely nothing to do with the following post, Clint's character, William Munny, was right when he said, "Deserve's got nothing to do with it".
There’s a turn of words floating around out there that has existed for way too long and in some round about way, I’m going to try and set it straight, or at least point it back in the right direction. It basically boils down to something said along the lines of, “I don’t deserve a bike that nice” or “I’m not nearly good enough of a rider to need/want/deserve/ride a bike that nice”. First I’ll preface my rant with the statement that everyone has budgets they need to stick to and in no way, shape, or form am I going to ask you to pawn the Grandma’s heirloom china or give up the rent money to upgrade to the newest and latest wonder machine. If baby needs a new pair of shoes, that always trumps a new bike. Okay, with that concession out of the way, let’s move on to my little rant.
Bear with me, because I’m going to start with a couple of scenarios. A person comes in looking for a mountain bike. Their friends are all into mountain biking and now they want to join in. They are relatively fit and active. In fact, they are pretty good trail runners and expert level telemark skiers, but they are looking for a way to keep fit and still enjoy the same social circles as their friends who are going off exploring new singletrack every weekend. In fact, they’ve borrowed a mountain bike from time to time to compete in a couple of Xterra’s, and an off road triathlon. Now that person would be expected to consider a reasonable decent quality mountain bike. Probably not a top of the line one, but probably one with modern disc brakes, hydraulic damped suspension (at least a fork) and a drivetrain with the standard level of gears, so that replacement parts or upgrading down the line is possible, right?
Another customer strolls in looking for a road bike. They’ve been mountain biking for a while, and want to expand their stable. A lot of their friends are doing a century or two a year and raving about how fun it is and they’d like to join them. Plus, the mountain bike is fun, but they have to drive it to the trailhead and with a road bike they could just sneak out for a quick ride from their house. Maybe they’ve had a couple of spills and the smoothness of the road bike is alluring and they’d like to transfer their off road fitness to the tarmac. That customer should be looking at a road bike that will be comfortable, fast, and smooth, right? Something with good quality wheels and a frame that fits. Again, a bike with shifters and gears that are replaceable or upgradable with a recent standard.
Unfortunately, a large amount of people that fit those descriptions and even a surprising amount of regular, experienced, committed cyclists downgrade themselves with the mindset of, “yeah that’s a nice bike and I love how it rides, but I don’t deserve a bike that nice. I’ll never be that good of a rider”. I’ve even heard, “I could never ride that bike in the way it’s meant to be ridden”, which might be true if you are 5′ tall and you are looking at a 63cm road bike. But here’s the kicker, you do deserve it, and you will be able to ride that bike like it was meant to be ridden.
No weekend duffer could hit Tiger Woods’ clubs (except for maybe his ex-wife, but only then on Escalade rear windows). They are too precise of a tool. Golf clubs made for amateurs are designed to make the ball go straight, despite the golfers swing flaws. Weekend warriors rarely hit a ball straight, except by accident. Pro’s clubs allow the ball to move however the pro wants to make it move. They rarely hit a ball straight on purpose.
Roger Federer’s tennis racket it strung super tight for superior control and it has a tiny sweet spot. Hit it off center and it will send a stinger up your arm. He’s able to generate his own power and doesn’t need the racket to do it. Go to the pro shop and buy a racket for your game and it will have looser strings for more power and a sweet spot the size of a dinner plate to compensate for your weak backhand and suspect second serve.
No one who will ever read this could make it a lap around a race course driving an F1 car. We just aren’t skilled enough to drive the car as fast as it is required. They rely on going an insane amount of speed to generate downforce and that speed actually keeps them on the track. You or I would get scared halfway there, back off the trottle to keep from soiling ourselves, and never heat the tires enough to be sticky or get enough airflow over the car to push it down on the pavement. Think about the fastest you’ve ever gone on the freeway and double it. That’s how fast you have to drive those cars to get them to work, except it’s not the freeway, but a windy and twisty circuit that barely has a straight line on it.
Not with bikes. If you and Zdnek Stybar are close to the same height, you could hop on his Ridley X-NIght and it would be the fastest, smoothest, easiest to race cyclocross bike you’ve ever ridden. Same with mountain bike. Lets’ say you have same genetic blessings as Barry Wicks(and this perpetually slow author. We’re both tall, he’s fast). If you threw a leg over his Kona Hei Hei 29er, it would feel like the trail got smoother, the hills shorter and less steep, and your back would thank you every time you lifted it up on the roof rack. Road bikes, too. The Ridley Damocles and Heliums specially prepared for the Belgian cobbles and the French Alpes would make your local crit or hilly century like a walk in the park.
Do you know why? Because the Pros ride the same bikes as you and I. They just happen to be really nice ones. Sometimes, the bikes the pros are on aren’t even as nice as the ones you and I can buy off the shelf. Teams have budgets and often that means they all get alloy bars and stems instead of carbon ones that cost three times as much. Cassettes are sometimes Ultegra or SRAM Force level. Shoot, if you are a Campy fan, there’s only one team in Europe on Super Record. Most of them “make do” with Record. Even Ned Overend, one of the greatest mountain bikers ever and at 54 years old is a racer who can still finish 12th in the national championships, doesn’t race a super nice bike. His frame is the same one that comes on a mid-level Specialized.
Also, here’s a little fiance for ya’. Pros don’t buy their gear. It’s not even given to them. At the super high end, companies pay money to put their product under the butts of the pros. Plus, they have to pony up all the gear, and no one goes through gear like people not paying for it. That’s why the teams all use the alloy bars and other less expensive bits. It costs a supplier a bit less. (Also, pro road bike are at or below the UCI mandated minimum weight, so if they can put something on a bike that costs less, is stiffer, and weighs more, everyone wins. And it keeps a mechanic from dropping fishing sinkers down a seat tube to meet the minimum weights..)
All in all, it takes a metric boatload of people to buy “bikes they don’t deserve” to pay for the pros to ride those bikes. That’s why all the ad campaigns are touting the sponsored racers and how awesome they are because of those “pro” bikes. The bike companies have to sponsor a team at great expense, to have an ad campaign touting those bikes fostering that team’s success, so that they can sell lots of the bikes to pay for the team sponsorships and ad campaign. Wait, what? Yup, a bit of a vicious circle, isn’t it. Basically, the bikes aren’t made for the pros, they are made for you.
Okay, if you haven’t fallen asleep or clicked away during the pros vs. joes segment of today’s unhinged rant I have couple of more points to make. Some of them are salient and related, but it’s late, so no promises on how this all will turn out. I won’t hate you if you leave, but please call me later, okay? Okay?
When bikes are made, everything is a compromise in expense. If a really nice set of wheels costs Y, then there is only X amount to spend on the seat, grips, and pedals, and so on and so on. The better quality a bike is the smaller and lesser those compromises are. Aslo, at the very low end of whatever type of bike you are looking at, they tend to be styled like that type of bike more than they are equipped like that type of bike. Think mall cruiser 4×4. It’s not ready for real off roading in the same way a crappy Honda with a coffee can sized exhaust isn’t a rally car.
Here’s a down and dirty fact. Nicer bikes work better, longer. They take someone’s skills and allow them to flourish and grow sooner and farther. You wouldn’t jump into kayaking Class 3 and 4 whitewater with a crappy Sevlor Tahiti. You’d get the best boat you could swing. I don’t know of anyone who would take up running 10k’s and go to Payless Shoes for their kicks. You may not buy a top of the line bike, or even anything close to it when you are getting into the sport, but you shouldn’t buy a bike that you’ll wear out, break, and have to replace almost immediately. Also, who says beginners should get the crappiest, hardest to ride, and worst gear? Shouldn’t they get something a bit better that makes their into to the sport a bit more fun and enjoyable? I know beginner level skis are designed to help a skier turn. Shouldn’t beginner level bikes be designed to help people ride?
Bottom line, you do deserve it. Or maybe you don’t. Remember, deserve’s got nothing to do with it. Buy a bike that meets your budget and your needs. One you can have fun on and one that will last. No bike company or shop is going to make you do an eHarmony type interview to get a bike. And in a brief moment of seriousness, if you ever have any doubt, please feel free to call, email, stop by, or throw a brick through the window with a note attached. Service Course Velo is first and foremost here to help.
Cheers.